Search for: "Day v. Corrections"
Results 1 - 20
of 10,824
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2022, 4:00 pm
She was of the view, that because Jolly was a well-meaning and honest officer, 20 days without pay sufficiently reinforced the significance of his errors that fateful day.# # #You can read more about the case here: Dep’t of Correction v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 5:57 am
The post From This Day Forward: Technical Corrections Act Amends Statute of Limitations appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 3:00 pm
The petition of the day is: Long v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 8:10 am
Continuing our series of podcasts on oral argument days, we have two new podcasts below with attorneys who filed briefs on both sides of Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 11:59 am
Due to Respondent have no prior disciplinary record during his five years as a Correction Officer, it is recommended that Respondent be suspended for 60 days. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
Suspension for 45 days without pay recommended as the penalty for a correction officer found guilty of leaving an inmate unguarded in a hospital roomDepartment of Correction v Turpin, OATH Index #2070/09OATH Administrative Law Judge John Spooner found New York City correction officer Carlene Turpin guilty of charges that she walked off her post guarding an inmate in hospital room and left her weapon in a bathroom. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:24 am
Correction officer found guilty of “undue familiarity” with prison inmatesDepartment of Corrections v Murchison-Hunt, OATH Index #297/10OATH Administrative Law Judge Joan Salzman recommended that Mercedes Murchison-Hunt, a New York City correction officer who accepted earphones from an inmate, listened to music with them, and danced to the music in front of inmates while on duty be suspended for 60 days without pay.The ALJ explained that not… [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 10:29 am
Bray v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 7:21 am
The wife did not seek review in the Tax Court within the 90-day review period. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 8:23 pm
The petition of the day is: Lacaze v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 8:35 am
In Cubist Pharma v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 5:20 pm
The petition of the day is: Bartels v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:21 pm
The petition of the day is: Parker v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 4:26 pm
Delivery day Today is day 296 (9 ½ months. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 1:26 am
Correction Officer’s excessive absence may result in termination even if the result of verified or work-related injuryNYC Department of Corrections v Givens, OATH Index No. 393/09 (Dec. 29, 2008)ALJ Casey recommended termination for correction officer Vera Givens after Givens was absent from work for more than 135 days in a 14-month period in 2007 and 2008.Givens claimed that most of her absences were the result of work-related injuries, including… [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:57 am
Correction officer charged with disobeying an order to take a post assignmentNYC Department of Corrections v Callabrass, OATH Index #1981/10Regina Callabrass, a New York City correction officer, was served with a number of disciplinary charges alleging, among other things, that she was guilty of disobeying an order to take a post assignment.OATH Administrative Law Judge Tynia Richard recommended that the charge that the Callabrass disobeyed an order to take an… [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 7:58 pm
Correction officer charged with disobeying an order to take a post assignmentNYC Department of Corrections v Callabrass, OATH Index #1981/10Regina Callabrass, a New York City correction officer, was served with a number of disciplinary charges alleging, among other things, that she was guilty of disobeying an order to take a post assignment.OATH Administrative Law Judge Tynia Richard recommended that the charge that the Callabrass disobeyed an order to take an… [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:46 pm
By: Sarah Burke In Gardner v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 8:38 am
The petitions of the day are: Correctional Medical Services, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 3:10 am
In October 2022, the High Court in KeyHealth Medical Scheme v Ngoepe No and Others considered whether the court a quo was correct in finding that a medical scheme was prohibited from using day-to-day benefits to fund the treatment and costs of Prescribed Minimum Benefit (PMB) conditions. [read post]
